Despite recent progress in identifying latent causal structures using causal representation learning (CRL), what makes learned representations useful for causal downstream tasks and how to evaluate them are still not well understood. In this paper, we reinterpret CRL using a measurement model framework, where the learned representations are viewed as proxy measurements of the latent causal variables. Our approach clarifies the conditions under which learned representations support downstream causal reasoning and provides a principled basis for quantitatively assessing the quality of representations using a new Test-based Measurement EXclusivity (T-MEX) score. We validate T-MEX across diverse causal inference scenarios, including numerical simulations and real-world ecological video analysis, demonstrating that the proposed framework and corresponding score effectively assess the identification of learned representations and their usefulness for causal downstream tasks.

We provide explicit, finite-sample guarantees for learning causal representations from data with a sublinear number of environments. Causal representation learning seeks to provide a rigourous foundation for the general representation learning problem by bridging causal models with latent factor models in order to learn interpretable representations with causal semantics. Despite a blossoming theory of identifiability in causal representation learning, estimation and finite-sample bounds are less well understood. We show that causal representations can be learned with only a logarithmic number of unknown, multi-node interventions, and that the intervention targets need not be carefully designed in advance. Through a careful perturbation analysis, we provide a new analysis of this problem that guarantees consistent recovery of (a) the latent causal graph, (b) the mixing matrix and representations, and (c) \emph{unknown} intervention targets.

Causal representation learning seeks to uncover causal relationships among high-level latent variables from low-level, entangled, and noisy observations. Existing approaches often either rely on deep neural networks, which lack interpretability and formal guarantees, or impose restrictive assumptions like linearity, continuous-only observations, and strong structural priors. These limitations particularly challenge applications with a large number of discrete latent variables and mixed-type observations. To address these challenges, we propose discrete causal representation learning (DCRL), a generative framework that models a directed acyclic graph among discrete latent variables, along with a sparse bipartite graph linking latent and observed layers. This design accommodates continuous, count, and binary responses through flexible measurement models while maintaining interpretability. Under mild conditions, we prove that both the bipartite measurement graph and the latent causal graph are identifiable from the observed data distribution alone. We further propose a three-stage estimate-resample-discovery pipeline: penalized estimation of the generative model parameters, resampling of latent configurations from the fitted model, and score-based causal discovery on the resampled latents. We establish the consistency of this procedure, ensuring reliable recovery of the latent causal structure. Empirical studies on educational assessment and synthetic image data demonstrate that DCRL recovers sparse and interpretable latent causal structures.

Causal representation learning (CRL) aims to learn low-dimensional causal latent variables from high-dimensional observations. While identifiability has been extensively studied for CRL, estimation has been less explored. In this paper, we explore the use of empirical Bayes (EB) to estimate causal representations. In particular, we consider the problem of learning from data from multiple domains, where differences between domains are modeled by interventions in a shared underlying causal model. Multi-domain CRL naturally poses a simultaneous inference problem that EB is designed to tackle. Here, we propose an EB $f$-modeling algorithm that improves the quality of learned causal variables by exploiting invariant structure within and across domains. Specifically, we consider a linear measurement model and interventional priors arising from a shared acyclic SCM. When the graph and intervention targets are known, we develop an EM-style algorithm based on causally structured score matching. We further discuss EB $g$-modeling in the context of existing CRL approaches. In experiments on synthetic data, our proposed method achieves more accurate estimation than other methods for CRL.

Offline model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) enhances data efficiency by utilizing pre-collected datasets to learn models and policies, especially in scenarios where exploration is costly or infeasible. Nevertheless, its performance often suffers from the objective mismatch between model and policy learning, resulting in inferior performance despite accurate model predictions. This paper first identifies the primary source of this mismatch comes from the underlying confounders present in offline data for MBRL.

At the same time, the field of dynamical systems benefited from deep learning and scaled to countless applications but does not allow parameter identification.